Page 92 - British Inquiry into Loss of RMS Titanic Day 27 - 31
        P. 92
     
       	                 more than the two points; that is to say, the turning circle is about the same at the two speeds, but                 that  at  the  slower  speed  it  takes  double  as  long  as  at  the  other.  Therefore,  you  do  not  by                 decreasing your speed affect very much your power of averting that which it is your object to                 avert by your action. I accept that and start with that.                   But the proposition I desire to put before your Lordship is this, that nevertheless the reduction                 of speed is important, nay, essential for two reasons: in the first place, what you have to rely on                 under those circumstances is mainly the reversing of your engines, and at the slower speed you                 give your reversed engines a chance; at the higher speed in the distance at which this object was                 seen and at which such objects may be seen in future, your reversed engines have little or no                 chance  at  all.  In  the  first  place,  therefore,  you  give  double  the  opportunity  to  your  reversed                 engines.  For  example,  supposing  your  Lordship  found  this  object  was  seen  at  rather  over  a                 quarter of a mile; that happens to coincide with the distance in which this ship could alter two                 points at the speed she was going, that is, a distance of about 1,200 or 1,300 feet, Mr. Wilding                 said. Now, in that distance, 1,200 feet, or a quarter of a mile to travel, it is obvious that at the full                 speed the reversed engines, by the time the matter is communicated to the bridge, will not have                 any very great effect; but, still, in this case, in spite of that fact, whether by the reversing of the                 engines or by the pulling up consequent on the collision, this vessel was pulled up within some                 not very great distance of the berg, because it was seen and described to your Lordship after the                 event as being within sight and observation. That shows, I submit to your Lordship, that if the                 speed is half and the time, therefore, is doubled, although the distance at which the object is seen                 ex hypothesi will not be greater - it will be a quarter of a mile or whatever the distance is - the                 time which it takes to cover that distance, instead of being 37 seconds, is 74 seconds, or a minute                 and a quarter. In that time the reversed engines (your Lordship will be advised about this) will                 have a very much greater opportunity of doing their work and bringing the ship up.                   The Commissioner: Would the reversing of the engines when the vessel was going at 11 knots                 enable them to steer it as quickly as if they were going at the greater speed?                   Mr. Roche: I have not had an opportunity of considering this minutely, but I understand that                 the result is the same under all conditions, only it takes double the time. Your Lordship will be                 advised  about  that.  But  I  suppose  if  you  reverse  one  engine  and  keep  the  other  ahead  the                 conditions would be the same as if the speed were greater; it would be proportionately the same,                 only it would take double as long. We have no evidence to the contrary, and I do not know that                 the reduction of the speed would cause any difference in the steering of the ship or would cause                 the reversing to have any other influence at the slower speed than it would have at the higher                 speed. I do not know of any such evidence, and I do not know of any reason why it should be so.                   The Commissioner: I suppose the vessel would answer her helm quicker if she was going at the                 higher speed.                   Mr. Roche: That is the proposition which I started upon - she would answer much quicker: she                 would take double the time at the lower speed according to the relative speeds I am taking, and,                 therefore, she would alter just as much in the 74 seconds at the slower speed as she would in the                 37 seconds at the higher speed. It might be a little bit more; your Lordship will be advised about                 that,  but  I  am  assuming  against  my  argument  that  her  helm  would  not  alter  her  bearing  and                 position - her heading - any more in the 74 seconds with the slower speed than it would in the 37                 seconds with the higher speed. I say the conditions as regards the alteration with regard to the                 object would be identical, but the advantage of giving the opportunity to her reversed engines                 would be exactly double.                   The  Commissioner:  Would  the  result  be  any  more  than  this,  that  the  impact  would  not  be                 nearly so great?                   Mr. Roche: I was coming to that. In the first place you should have no impact at all; and the                 second point I was coming to is that the impact would in any case be very much less. As your
       
       
     





