Page 7 - British Inquiry into Loss of RMS Titanic Day 32 - 36
        P. 7
     
       	                 been a strong wind. All I mean is, I think it is put a great deal too high in the question which is                 addressed by Mr. Scanlan.                   The Commissioner: Oh, that you must expect; we have all done that in our time.                   Sir Robert Finlay: The vital point, the absence of swell, was one which no one realised until                 they got down to the water. That is the point.                   Then Mr. Owen Jones’s evidence is at page 665 -                   The Commissioner: I think if you would read the references, the numbers of the questions, that                 will be sufficient, because I shall have to look at all this.                   Sir Robert Finlay: If your Lordship pleases.                   The Commissioner: And only read those parts that you think are of great significance.                    Sir Robert Finlay: If your Lordship pleases. That will relieve me of a great deal of trouble. I                 think if all records run to such a length as this and one were to give the number of the question,                 such as 23598, one would need to introduce some system of units such as they have for giving                 the distance of a fixed star. It would shorten matters a little. On page 665, Question 23653, Mr.                 Scanlan asks what provision had he for a look-out, and he said: “Two men on the look-out. (Q.)                 Where? - (A.) One in the crow’s-nest and one on the stem head. (Q.) Was your one man on the                 stem head put on at night? - (A.) Yes, he was put on that night; just as we got on to the ice track.                 (Q.)  Did  you  consider  it  a  proper  precaution  to  put  a  man  at  the  stem  head  when  ice  was                 reported? - (A.) It had been always our custom; we have always done that for the last 27 years.                 (Q.) At night? - (A.) Yes. (Q.) Whether ice is reported or not? - (A.) In the ice track.” If you have                 only one man in the crow’s-nest; and they proceed on the principle of having one man, then on                 the ice track he would have a second man on the stem; but the evidence here is that the look-out                 from the crow’s-nest in the “Titanic” was rather better than from the stem.                   Then  Captain  Cannons,  at  page  666,  Questions  23746  down  to  23752,  says  that  in  clear                 weather  he  would  not  double  the  look-out  even  in  ice.  I  think  I  have  fairly  summarised  his                 evidence. He says that he carries one man on the look-out in the crow’s-nest in clear weather,                 and only that one in clear weather, except the officers on the bridge; that he would not increase                 the number of men on the look-out in clear weather, but would go steaming on with one man in                 the crow’s-nest, and that is all. The difference he makes, and this is the important answer, is in                 23751: “(Q.) You do not put anybody, apparently, in the stem head? - (A.) No, not unless the                 weather  becomes  hazy,  or  any  difference  to  ordinary  clear  weather.  (Q.)  If  the  weather  does                 become hazy it would be better to put a man on the stem head, I understand? - (A.) A man goes                 there immediately.”                   Then at Question 23765 Mr. Scanlan returns to the charge upon this point. He says: “(Q.) If                 there is any difficulty at all in seeing ahead at night, would it be in accordance with your practice                 to double the look-out? - (A.) Yes. (Q.) You think that would be the proper thing to do? - (A.) If                 there was any haze at all, yes, immediately. (Q.) Apart from haze, if there was what has been                 described here as a flat calm, and the conditions were such that it would be more difficult than on                 an ordinary clear night to see an iceberg ahead, would you double the look-out? - (A.) Not in                 perfectly clear weather. (Q.) If it is calm is it more difficult to see an iceberg? - (A.) I have not                 found it so.” So that it comes to this, according to the evidence of Captain Cannons, as long as                 the weather is perfectly clear there is no occasion to double the look-out.                   The Attorney-General: Whilst your Lordship has that before you - it saves so much turning to                 it  afterwards  -  would  your  Lordship  read  the  next  two  questions,  which  bear  upon  what  Mr.                 Lightoller describes as the one abnormal condition of which he had no knowledge.                   Sir Robert Finlay: I will read that: “(Q.) If it is calm is it more difficult to see an iceberg? -                 (A.)  I  have  not  found  it  so.  (The  Commissioner.)  Do  you  think  it  is  more  difficult  to  see  an                 iceberg when the sea is flat and with the weather quite clear? Do you think the flat sea prevents                 you from seeing an iceberg as readily as you would do if the sea were rough or rippled? - (A.)
       
       
     
