Page 4 - British Inquiry into Loss of RMS Titanic Day 14 - 18
        P. 4
     
       	                 MR. W. D. HARBINSON (instructed by Mr. Farrell) appeared on behalf of the third-class passengers. (Admitted on                                                          application.)                      MR. ROBERTSON DUNLOP watched the proceedings on behalf of the owners and officers of the s.s.                                        “Californian.” (Leyland Line). (Admitted on Application.)                 MR. H. E. DUKE, K. C., M. P., and MR. VAUGHAN WILIAMS (instructed by Messrs. A. F. and R. W. Tweedie)                         appeared as Counsel on behalf of Sir Cosmo and Lady Duff-Gordon. (Admitted on Application.)                   Sir Robert Finlay: My Lord, I will not interrupt this witness (Turnbull) of course, but by-and-                 bye I desire permission to recall both Mr. Lightoller and Mr. Boxhall with regard to the question                 whether these messages were ever transmitted to the Captain or any of the officers on board the                 “Titanic”?                   The Commissioner: Very well, quite right..                   Sir Robert Finlay: As far as I recollect, no questions were put to Mr. Lightoller on the subject                 at all or to Mr. Boxhall, except in re-examination.                   The Solicitor-General: I think Sir Robert is right, and I realise, whatever we prove or do not                 prove with the help of the witness, we do not in any case by this evidence do more than carry                 messages to the Marconi office on the “Titanic.” What happened to them when they got into that                 office is not a matter which the present witness can tell at all.                   The Commissioner: Nor does it matter.                   The Solicitor-General: Well, of course, it matters from the point of view of liability, because,                 of  course,  the  Marconi  operator  may  be  regarded  as  not  in  the  service  of  the  White  Star                 Company; he may not be their servant, your Lordship sees.                   The Commissioner: Well, in a sense, he is not.                   Sir Robert Finlay: I think, my Lord, in no sense is he in the service of the ship. Of course he is                 under discipline as everyone on board the ship must be, but he is not in their service; he is the                 servant of the Marconi Company.                   The  Commissioner:  Still  he  is  there,  I  suppose,  for  the  very  purpose,  as  a  servant  of  the                 Marconi Company of communicating to the people in charge of the ship the messages which he                 gets which would affect the navigation.                   Sir  Robert  Finlay:  Yes.  I  think  we  should  be  able  without  going  into  detail  at  the  present                 moment to satisfy your Lordship beyond all doubt that these messages, the “Mesaba” message                 and the “Amerika” message, were not communicated either to the Commander or to any of the                 officers on board the “Titanic.”                   The  Commissioner:  We  need  not  say  anything  about  it  at  present;  we  had  better  hear  the                 evidence.                                        GEORGE ELLIOTT TURNBULL, Recalled.                                     Further examined by the SOLICITOR-GENERAL.                   16088. We were asking you about these different messages in order of time, and I think you                 had given us evidence about the message from the “La Touraine”? - Yes.                   We need not go back on that. The next one I wanted some information about was the message                 from the “Caronia.” Your Lordship will remember this is only by way of confirmation, because                 on page 273 of the Shorthand Notes Captain Barr has already given evidence about it.                   Sir Robert Finlay: I do not think there is any dispute as to the “Caronia” message, my Lord.                   The Commissioner: No. I thought you could assist me by indicating the messages as we go                 along  with  this  gentleman  the  receipt  of  which  you  dispute;  that  is  the  receipt  of  which  you                 dispute so far as the officers were concerned.
       
       
     
